Russian Federation vs Tunisia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological)

Russian Federation
196.84
in 2025
Tunisia
196.02
in 2025
Russian Federation rank
28th
Tunisia rank
29th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Tunisia
050100150200199120082025

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 196.84 against 196.02 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.82.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tunisia ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 28th and Tunisia ranks 29th of 135 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 3.89 40.25 36.36 Tunisia
2000s 36.65 47.88 11.23 Tunisia
2010s 94.47 98.44 3.97 Tunisia
2020s 164.01 171.38 7.37 Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological), Russian Federation or Tunisia?
Russian Federation, at 196.84 against 196.02 in Tunisia as of 2025.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) between Russian Federation and Tunisia?
0.82, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Tunisia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
How do Russian Federation and Tunisia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological)?
Russian Federation ranks 28th and Tunisia ranks 29th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer Price Index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Tunisia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-biological-producer-price-index-2014-2016/russian-federation-2/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-biological-producer-price-index-2014-2016/russian-federation-2/tunisia/">Russian Federation vs Tunisia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer Price Index (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 4,839 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

This sub-domain contains data on agriculture producer prices and the producer price index. Agriculture producer prices are prices received by farmers for primary crops, live animals and livestock primary products as collected at the point of initial sale (prices paid at the farm gate). Annual data are provided from 1991 (while mothly data start in January 2010) for 180 countries and 212 products. The producer price index is the index of agricultural producer prices that measures the average annual change over time in the selling prices received by farmers (prices at the farm gate or at the first point of sale). The three categories of producer price index available in FAOSTAT comprise: single-item price index, commodity group index and the agriculture producer price index.