Chile vs Saint Lucia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological)

Chile
173.66
in 2025
Saint Lucia
169.79
in 2025
Chile rank
40th
Saint Lucia rank
43rd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) over time

  • Chile
  • Saint Lucia
50100150200250199120082025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 173.66 against 169.79 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 3.87.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

Chile ranks 40th and Saint Lucia ranks 43rd of 135 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1990s 44.43 58.27 13.84 Saint Lucia
2000s 53.46 70.15 16.68 Saint Lucia
2010s 96.31 95.72 0.593 Chile
2020s 169.75 173.19 3.44 Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological), Chile or Saint Lucia?
Chile, at 173.66 against 169.79 in Saint Lucia as of 2025.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) between Chile and Saint Lucia?
3.87, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Saint Lucia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Chile and Saint Lucia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological)?
Chile ranks 40th and Saint Lucia ranks 43rd of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer Price Index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Saint Lucia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-biological-producer-price-index-2014-2016/chile/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-biological-producer-price-index-2014-2016/chile/st-lucia/">Chile vs Saint Lucia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer Price Index (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 4,839 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

This sub-domain contains data on agriculture producer prices and the producer price index. Agriculture producer prices are prices received by farmers for primary crops, live animals and livestock primary products as collected at the point of initial sale (prices paid at the farm gate). Annual data are provided from 1991 (while mothly data start in January 2010) for 180 countries and 212 products. The producer price index is the index of agricultural producer prices that measures the average annual change over time in the selling prices received by farmers (prices at the farm gate or at the first point of sale). The three categories of producer price index available in FAOSTAT comprise: single-item price index, commodity group index and the agriculture producer price index.