Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Mauritania: Meat of asses, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Index

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
133.83
in 2024
Mauritania
161.66
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
3rd
Mauritania rank
1st

Meat of asses, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Index over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Mauritania
050100150196119922024

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 161.66 against 133.83 in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 27.83.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.2 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 3rd and Mauritania ranks 1st of 11 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 3 and Mauritania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 29.56 51.47 21.92 Mauritania
1970s 42.05 54.4 12.34 Mauritania
1980s 46.33 45.35 0.988 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 52.39 54.98 2.59 Mauritania
2000s 81.03 78.92 2.12 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 105.32 102.96 2.36 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 128.1 146.43 18.34 Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of asses, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production index, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 161.66 against 133.83 in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of asses, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production index between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Mauritania?
27.83, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Mauritania?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Mauritania rank globally for meat of asses, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production index?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 3rd and Mauritania ranks 1st of 11 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of asses, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Mauritania: Meat of asses, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Index. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-asses-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-index-number-2014-2016-100/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-asses-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-index-number-2014-2016-100/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/mauritania/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Mauritania: Meat of asses, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of asses, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
22 places, 1,293 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.