Ukraine vs Uruguay: Groundnut Cake — Feed
Groundnut Cake — Feed over time
- Ukraine
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 559 t against 530 t in Ukraine, a difference of 29 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Ukraine's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uruguay ahead.
Ukraine ranks 92nd and Uruguay ranks 89th of 139 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ukraine | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.125 t | 746.75 t | 746.62 t | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 238.5 t | 688.4 t | 449.9 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 530 t | 664 t | 134 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher groundnut cake — feed, Ukraine or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 559 t against 530 t in Ukraine as of 2013.
- What is the difference in groundnut cake — feed between Ukraine and Uruguay?
- 29 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ukraine and Uruguay?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
- How do Ukraine and Uruguay rank globally for groundnut cake — feed?
- Ukraine ranks 92nd and Uruguay ranks 89th of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Groundnut Cake — Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.