What is the difference in food production index between Nauru and Sri Lanka?

0.28 2014-2016 = 100, with Nauru ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Sri Lanka?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Food production index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Nauru vs Sri Lanka: Food production index (2014-2016 = 100)

Nauru

102.85 2014-2016 = 100

in 2024

Sri Lanka

102.57 2014-2016 = 100

in 2024

Nauru rank

122nd

Sri Lanka rank

124th

Food production index (2014-2016 = 100) over time

Nauru
Sri Lanka

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 102.85 2014-2016 = 100 against 102.57 2014-2016 = 100 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.28 2014-2016 = 100.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nauru ahead.

Nauru ranks 122nd and Sri Lanka ranks 124th of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 6 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Nauru	Sri Lanka	Difference	Ahead
1960s	50.19 2014-2016 = 100	24.69 2014-2016 = 100	25.5 2014-2016 = 100	Nauru
1970s	61.07 2014-2016 = 100	30.45 2014-2016 = 100	30.62 2014-2016 = 100	Nauru
1980s	77.23 2014-2016 = 100	38.23 2014-2016 = 100	39 2014-2016 = 100	Nauru
1990s	79.88 2014-2016 = 100	59.77 2014-2016 = 100	20.11 2014-2016 = 100	Nauru
2000s	91.99 2014-2016 = 100	73.9 2014-2016 = 100	18.09 2014-2016 = 100	Nauru
2010s	100.79 2014-2016 = 100	96.93 2014-2016 = 100	3.86 2014-2016 = 100	Nauru
2020s	102.64 2014-2016 = 100	104.55 2014-2016 = 100	1.91 2014-2016 = 100	Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food production index, Nauru or Sri Lanka?: Nauru, at 102.85 2014-2016 = 100 against 102.57 2014-2016 = 100 in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
What is the difference in food production index between Nauru and Sri Lanka?: 0.28 2014-2016 = 100, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Sri Lanka?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Nauru and Sri Lanka rank globally for food production index?: Nauru ranks 122nd and Sri Lanka ranks 124th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?: FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Food production index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Sri Lanka: Food production index. Statizoid, drawing on FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-production-index-2014-2016-100/naoero/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-production-index-2014-2016-100/naoero/sri-lanka/">Nauru vs Sri Lanka: Food production index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Food production index (2014-2016 = 100)
Unit: 2014-2016 = 100
Source: FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 242 places, 14,280 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 12 November 2026

Food production index covers food crops that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. Coffee and tea are excluded because, although edible, they have no nutritive value.