What is the difference in food production index between Nauru and New Zealand?

0.23 2014-2016 = 100, with Nauru ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and New Zealand?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Food production index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Nauru vs New Zealand: Food production index (2014-2016 = 100)

Nauru

102.85 2014-2016 = 100

in 2024

New Zealand

102.62 2014-2016 = 100

in 2024

Nauru rank

122nd

New Zealand rank

123rd

Food production index (2014-2016 = 100) over time

Nauru
New Zealand

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 102.85 2014-2016 = 100 against 102.62 2014-2016 = 100 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.23 2014-2016 = 100.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nauru ahead.

Nauru ranks 122nd and New Zealand ranks 123rd of 195 countries.

Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Nauru	New Zealand	Difference	Ahead
1960s	50.19 2014-2016 = 100	39.6 2014-2016 = 100	10.59 2014-2016 = 100	Nauru
1970s	61.07 2014-2016 = 100	47.4 2014-2016 = 100	13.67 2014-2016 = 100	Nauru
1980s	77.23 2014-2016 = 100	56.01 2014-2016 = 100	21.22 2014-2016 = 100	Nauru
1990s	79.88 2014-2016 = 100	63.55 2014-2016 = 100	16.33 2014-2016 = 100	Nauru
2000s	91.99 2014-2016 = 100	80.49 2014-2016 = 100	11.5 2014-2016 = 100	Nauru
2010s	100.79 2014-2016 = 100	95.76 2014-2016 = 100	5.03 2014-2016 = 100	Nauru
2020s	102.64 2014-2016 = 100	102.41 2014-2016 = 100	0.23 2014-2016 = 100	Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food production index, Nauru or New Zealand?: Nauru, at 102.85 2014-2016 = 100 against 102.62 2014-2016 = 100 in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in food production index between Nauru and New Zealand?: 0.23 2014-2016 = 100, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and New Zealand?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Nauru and New Zealand rank globally for food production index?: Nauru ranks 122nd and New Zealand ranks 123rd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?: FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Food production index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs New Zealand: Food production index. Statizoid, drawing on FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-production-index-2014-2016-100/naoero/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-production-index-2014-2016-100/naoero/new-zealand/">Nauru vs New Zealand: Food production index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Food production index (2014-2016 = 100)
Unit: 2014-2016 = 100
Source: FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 242 places, 14,280 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 12 November 2026

Food production index covers food crops that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. Coffee and tea are excluded because, although edible, they have no nutritive value.