Ecuador vs Serbia: Food production index
Ecuador
98.86 2014-2016 = 100
in 2022
Serbia
98.37 2014-2016 = 100
in 2022
Ecuador rank
149th
Serbia rank
152nd
Food production index over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 98.86 2014-2016 = 100 against 98.37 2014-2016 = 100 in Serbia, a difference of 0.49 2014-2016 = 100.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 149th and Serbia ranks 152nd of 195 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.17 2014-2016 = 100 | 98.34 2014-2016 = 100 | 8.16 2014-2016 = 100 | Serbia |
| 2010s | 97.55 2014-2016 = 100 | 99.02 2014-2016 = 100 | 1.46 2014-2016 = 100 | Serbia |
| 2020s | 99.01 2014-2016 = 100 | 104.51 2014-2016 = 100 | 5.5 2014-2016 = 100 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food production index, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Ecuador, at 98.86 2014-2016 = 100 against 98.37 2014-2016 = 100 in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in food production index between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 0.49 2014-2016 = 100, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for food production index?
- Ecuador ranks 149th and Serbia ranks 152nd of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Food production index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food production index covers food crops that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. Coffee and tea are excluded because, although edible, they have no nutritive value.