Belgium vs Japan: Food production index
Belgium
100 2014-2016 = 100
in 2022
Japan
100.27 2014-2016 = 100
in 2022
Belgium rank
143rd
Japan rank
142nd
Food production index over time
- Belgium
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 100.27 2014-2016 = 100 against 100 2014-2016 = 100 in Belgium, a difference of 0.27 2014-2016 = 100.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Japan ahead.
Belgium ranks 143rd and Japan ranks 142nd of 195 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.64 2014-2016 = 100 | 99.45 2014-2016 = 100 | 4.81 2014-2016 = 100 | Japan |
| 2010s | 98.25 2014-2016 = 100 | 98.89 2014-2016 = 100 | 0.632 2014-2016 = 100 | Japan |
| 2020s | 101.58 2014-2016 = 100 | 100.31 2014-2016 = 100 | 1.27 2014-2016 = 100 | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food production index, Belgium or Japan?
- Japan, at 100.27 2014-2016 = 100 against 100 2014-2016 = 100 in Belgium as of 2022.
- What is the difference in food production index between Belgium and Japan?
- 0.27 2014-2016 = 100, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Japan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Belgium and Japan rank globally for food production index?
- Belgium ranks 143rd and Japan ranks 142nd of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Food production index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food production index covers food crops that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. Coffee and tea are excluded because, although edible, they have no nutritive value.