Cambodia vs Guinea-Bissau: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.

Cambodia
44.27 million 1000 SLC
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau
427.99 million 1000 SLC
in 2024
Cambodia rank
4th
Guinea-Bissau rank
2nd

Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. over time

  • Cambodia
  • Guinea-Bissau
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M196119922024

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 427.99 million 1000 SLC against 44.27 million 1000 SLC in Cambodia, a difference of 383.72 million 1000 SLC.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 9.7 times Cambodia's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 4th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 2nd of 48 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 4.48 million 1000 SLC 198.20 million 1000 SLC 193.72 million 1000 SLC Guinea-Bissau
1970s 6.36 million 1000 SLC 188.16 million 1000 SLC 181.80 million 1000 SLC Guinea-Bissau
1980s 9.91 million 1000 SLC 226.76 million 1000 SLC 216.86 million 1000 SLC Guinea-Bissau
1990s 22.01 million 1000 SLC 292.41 million 1000 SLC 270.40 million 1000 SLC Guinea-Bissau
2000s 32.17 million 1000 SLC 337.72 million 1000 SLC 305.55 million 1000 SLC Guinea-Bissau
2010s 42.04 million 1000 SLC 374.29 million 1000 SLC 332.25 million 1000 SLC Guinea-Bissau
2020s 44.31 million 1000 SLC 426.92 million 1000 SLC 382.61 million 1000 SLC Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., Cambodia or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 427.99 million 1000 SLC against 44.27 million 1000 SLC in Cambodia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. between Cambodia and Guinea-Bissau?
383.72 million 1000 SLC, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Guinea-Bissau?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Cambodia and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
Cambodia ranks 4th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 2nd of 48 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Guinea-Bissau: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-gross-production-4/cambodia/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-gross-production-4/cambodia/guinea-bissau/">Cambodia vs Guinea-Bissau: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC)
Unit
1000 SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
52 places, 2,757 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.