Papua New Guinea vs South-eastern Asia: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.

Papua New Guinea
80,554 1000 Int$
in 2024
South-eastern Asia
1.25 million 1000 Int$
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
5th
South-eastern Asia rank
3rd

Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • South-eastern Asia
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922024

How they compare

South-eastern Asia currently reports 1.25 million 1000 Int$ against 80,554 1000 Int$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 1.16 million 1000 Int$.

That makes South-eastern Asia's figure about 15.5 times Papua New Guinea's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, South-eastern Asia has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 5th and South-eastern Asia ranks 3rd of 76 countries.

South-eastern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea South-eastern Asia Difference Ahead
1960s 39,976 1000 Int$ 264,267 1000 Int$ 224,291 1000 Int$ South-eastern Asia
1970s 46,809 1000 Int$ 216,314 1000 Int$ 169,505 1000 Int$ South-eastern Asia
1980s 52,649 1000 Int$ 111,643 1000 Int$ 58,994 1000 Int$ South-eastern Asia
1990s 57,610 1000 Int$ 112,136 1000 Int$ 54,526 1000 Int$ South-eastern Asia
2000s 66,231 1000 Int$ 149,733 1000 Int$ 83,502 1000 Int$ South-eastern Asia
2010s 75,349 1000 Int$ 636,938 1000 Int$ 561,589 1000 Int$ South-eastern Asia
2020s 80,469 1000 Int$ 1.11 million 1000 Int$ 1.03 million 1000 Int$ South-eastern Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., Papua New Guinea or South-eastern Asia?
South-eastern Asia, at 1.25 million 1000 Int$ against 80,554 1000 Int$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. between Papua New Guinea and South-eastern Asia?
1.16 million 1000 Int$, with South-eastern Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and South-eastern Asia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and South-eastern Asia rank globally for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
Papua New Guinea ranks 5th and South-eastern Asia ranks 3rd of 76 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs South-eastern Asia: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-gross-production-2/papua-new-guinea/south-eastern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-gross-production-2/papua-new-guinea/south-eastern-asia/">Papua New Guinea vs South-eastern Asia: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)
Unit
1000 Int$
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
114 places, 5,882 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.