Middle Africa vs Papua New Guinea: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.

Middle Africa
233,599 1000 Int$
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
80,554 1000 Int$
in 2024
Middle Africa rank
4th
Papua New Guinea rank
5th

Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. over time

  • Middle Africa
  • Papua New Guinea
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922024

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 233,599 1000 Int$ against 80,554 1000 Int$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 153,045 1000 Int$.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 2.9 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Middle Africa ranks 4th and Papua New Guinea ranks 5th of 13 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Middle Africa averaged higher in 4 and Papua New Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 15,506 1000 Int$ 39,976 1000 Int$ 24,470 1000 Int$ Papua New Guinea
1970s 19,125 1000 Int$ 46,809 1000 Int$ 27,684 1000 Int$ Papua New Guinea
1980s 19,598 1000 Int$ 52,649 1000 Int$ 33,052 1000 Int$ Papua New Guinea
1990s 72,428 1000 Int$ 57,610 1000 Int$ 14,819 1000 Int$ Middle Africa
2000s 152,106 1000 Int$ 66,231 1000 Int$ 85,875 1000 Int$ Middle Africa
2010s 222,677 1000 Int$ 75,349 1000 Int$ 147,329 1000 Int$ Middle Africa
2020s 233,885 1000 Int$ 80,469 1000 Int$ 153,416 1000 Int$ Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., Middle Africa or Papua New Guinea?
Middle Africa, at 233,599 1000 Int$ against 80,554 1000 Int$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. between Middle Africa and Papua New Guinea?
153,045 1000 Int$, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Papua New Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Middle Africa and Papua New Guinea rank globally for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
Middle Africa ranks 4th and Papua New Guinea ranks 5th of 13 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs Papua New Guinea: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-gross-production-2/middle-africa/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-gross-production-2/middle-africa/papua-new-guinea/">Middle Africa vs Papua New Guinea: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)
Unit
1000 Int$
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
114 places, 5,882 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.