Congo vs Western Africa: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.

Congo
13,803 1000 Int$
in 2024
Western Africa
29,235 1000 Int$
in 2024
Congo rank
14th
Western Africa rank
13th

Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. over time

  • Congo
  • Western Africa
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922024

How they compare

Western Africa currently reports 29,235 1000 Int$ against 13,803 1000 Int$ in Congo, a difference of 15,432 1000 Int$.

That makes Western Africa's figure about 2.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Western Africa ahead.

Congo ranks 14th and Western Africa ranks 13th of 76 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Western Africa in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Western Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 3,901 1000 Int$ 8,838 1000 Int$ 4,937 1000 Int$ Western Africa
1970s 4,650 1000 Int$ 8,390 1000 Int$ 3,740 1000 Int$ Western Africa
1980s 5,594 1000 Int$ 10,121 1000 Int$ 4,527 1000 Int$ Western Africa
1990s 8,028 1000 Int$ 4,953 1000 Int$ 3,075 1000 Int$ Congo
2000s 8,587 1000 Int$ 18,037 1000 Int$ 9,450 1000 Int$ Western Africa
2010s 12,818 1000 Int$ 25,742 1000 Int$ 12,924 1000 Int$ Western Africa
2020s 13,748 1000 Int$ 29,205 1000 Int$ 15,457 1000 Int$ Western Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., Congo or Western Africa?
Western Africa, at 29,235 1000 Int$ against 13,803 1000 Int$ in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. between Congo and Western Africa?
15,432 1000 Int$, with Western Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Western Africa?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Congo and Western Africa rank globally for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
Congo ranks 14th and Western Africa ranks 13th of 76 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Western Africa: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-gross-production-2/congo-rep/western-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-gross-production-2/congo-rep/western-africa/">Congo vs Western Africa: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)
Unit
1000 Int$
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
114 places, 5,882 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.