Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.
Melanesia
77.54
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
79.58
in 2024
Melanesia rank
10th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
9th
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. over time
- Melanesia
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 79.58 against 77.54 in Melanesia, a difference of 2.04.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Melanesia ahead.
Melanesia ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 12 countries.
Melanesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 123.31 | 14.75 | 108.56 | Melanesia |
| 2000s | 114.41 | 31.18 | 83.23 | Melanesia |
| 2010s | 100.9 | 94.7 | 6.2 | Melanesia |
| 2020s | 85.19 | 84.77 | 0.412 | Melanesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., Melanesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
- United Republic of Tanzania, at 79.58 against 77.54 in Melanesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. between Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 2.04, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
- How do Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Melanesia ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 12 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.