Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
16,541 ha
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
993 ha
in 2024
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
8th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
11th

Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922024

How they compare

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) currently reports 16,541 ha against 993 ha in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 15,548 ha.

That makes Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s figure about 16.7 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) has been ahead every year.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 11th of 13 countries.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 20,000 ha 100 ha 19,900 ha Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2000s 16,494 ha 256.5 ha 16,238 ha Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2010s 17,058 ha 902.8 ha 16,155 ha Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2020s 16,468 ha 997 ha 15,471 ha Bolivia (Plurinational State of)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or United Republic of Tanzania?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of), at 16,541 ha against 993 ha in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
15,548 ha, with Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 11th of 13 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Area harvested. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-area-harvested/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-area-harvested/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Area harvested
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
112 places, 5,943 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Crop and livestock statistics are recorded for 278 products, covering the following categories: 1) CROPS PRIMARY: Cereals, Citrus Fruit, Fibre Crops, Fruit, Oil Crops, Oil Crops and Cakes in Oil Equivalent, Pulses, Roots and Tubers, Sugar Crops, Treenuts and Vegetables. Data are expressed in terms of area harvested, production quantity and yield. Cereals: Area and production data on cereals relate to crops harvested for dry grain only. Cereal crops harvested for hay or harvested green for food, feed or silage or used for grazing are therefore excluded. 2) CROPS PROCESSED: Beer of barley; Cotton lint; Cottonseed; Margarine, short; Molasses; Oil, coconut (copra); Oil, cottonseed; Oil, groundnut; Oil, linseed; Oil, maize; Oil, olive, virgin; Oil, palm; Oil, palm kernel; Oil, rapeseed; Oil, safflower; Oil, sesame; Oil, soybean; Oil, sunflower; Palm kernels; Sugar Raw Centrifugal; Wine. 3) LIVE ANIMALS: Animals live n.e.s.; Asses; Beehives; Buffaloes; Camelids, other; Camels; Cattle; Chickens; Ducks; Geese and guinea fowls; Goats; Horses; Mules; Pigeons, other birds; Pigs; Rabbits and hares; Rodents, other; Sheep; Turkeys. 4) LIVESTOCK PRIMARY: Beeswax; Eggs (various types); Hides buffalo, fresh; Hides, cattle, fresh; Honey, natural; Meat (ass, bird nes, buffalo, camel, cattle, chicken, duck, game, goat, goose and guinea fowl, horse, mule, Meat nes, meat other camelids, Meat other rodents, pig, rabbit, sheep, turkey); Milk (buffalo, camel, cow, goat, sheep); Offals, nes; Silk-worm cocoons, reelable; Skins (goat, sheep); Snails, not sea; Wool, greasy. 5) LIVESTOCK PROCESSED: Butter (of milk from sheep, goat, buffalo, cow); Cheese (of milk from goat, buffalo, sheep, cow milk); Cheese of skimmed cow milk; Cream fresh; Ghee (cow and buffalo milk); Lard; Milk (dry buttermilk, skimmed condensed, skimmed cow, skimmed dried, skimmed evaporated, whole condensed, whole dried, whole evaporated); Silk raw; Tallow; Whey (condensed and dry); Yoghurt.