Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Suriname: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Saint Kitts and Nevis
2.91 t
in 2024
Suriname
3.63 t
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
220th
Suriname rank
218th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Suriname
051015196119922024

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 3.63 t against 2.91 t in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.72 t.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.2 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 220th and Suriname ranks 218th of 234 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Saint Kitts and Nevis averaged higher in 5 and Suriname in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 14.48 t 4.76 t 9.72 t Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 14.62 t 3.94 t 10.68 t Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 14.86 t 5.46 t 9.39 t Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 12.31 t 9.63 t 2.68 t Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 5.87 t 5.79 t 0.081 t Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 2.04 t 3.89 t 1.85 t Suriname
2020s 2.76 t 3.74 t 0.976 t Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Suriname?
Suriname, at 3.63 t against 2.91 t in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Suriname?
0.72 t, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Suriname?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 220th and Suriname ranks 218th of 234 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Suriname: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/saint-kitts-and-nevis/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/saint-kitts-and-nevis/suriname/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Suriname: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
264 places, 14,768 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.