Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Ecuador
770.54 t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
876.51 t
in 2024
Ecuador rank
115th
Zimbabwe rank
112th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Ecuador
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 876.51 t against 770.54 t in Ecuador, a difference of 105.97 t.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 112th of 234 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 822.37 t 187.52 t 634.85 t Ecuador
1970s 800.2 t 218.1 t 582.1 t Ecuador
1980s 503.23 t 112.14 t 391.09 t Ecuador
1990s 733.59 t 92.01 t 641.58 t Ecuador
2000s 1,332 t 93.64 t 1,238 t Ecuador
2010s 719.55 t 438.58 t 280.96 t Ecuador
2020s 873.5 t 573.88 t 299.61 t Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 876.51 t against 770.54 t in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
105.97 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Ecuador ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 112th of 234 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/ecuador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/ecuador/zimbabwe/">Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
264 places, 14,768 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.