Mauritania vs Sudan: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Mauritania
0.0012 t per person
in 2024
Sudan
0.0012 t per person
in 2024
Mauritania rank
16th
Sudan rank
15th
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Mauritania
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0.0012 t per person against 0.0012 t per person in Mauritania, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Mauritania ranks 16th and Sudan ranks 15th of 160 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0011 t per person | 0.0014 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0012 t per person | 0.0012 t per person | 0 t per person | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Mauritania or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0.0012 t per person against 0.0012 t per person in Mauritania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Mauritania and Sudan?
- 0 t per person, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Mauritania and Sudan rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Mauritania ranks 16th and Sudan ranks 15th of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.