China, Macao SAR vs Kyrgyzstan: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

China, Macao SAR
364.87 t
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan
331.91 t
in 2024
China, Macao SAR rank
133rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
136th

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Kyrgyzstan
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922024

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 364.87 t against 331.91 t in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 32.96 t.

That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 133rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 136th of 225 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1990s 682.15 t 1,519 t 836.46 t Kyrgyzstan
2000s 673.12 t 1,188 t 515.03 t Kyrgyzstan
2010s 515.35 t 884.03 t 368.68 t Kyrgyzstan
2020s 366.61 t 489.41 t 122.8 t Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, China, Macao SAR or Kyrgyzstan?
China, Macao SAR, at 364.87 t against 331.91 t in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between China, Macao SAR and Kyrgyzstan?
32.96 t, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Kyrgyzstan?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do China, Macao SAR and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
China, Macao SAR ranks 133rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 136th of 225 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Kyrgyzstan: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/china-macao-sar/kyrgyzstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/china-macao-sar/kyrgyzstan/">China, Macao SAR vs Kyrgyzstan: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
255 places, 14,368 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.