Chile vs Southern Africa: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Chile
49,370 t
in 2024
Southern Africa
22,778 t
in 2024
Chile rank
27th
Southern Africa rank
25th

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Chile
  • Southern Africa
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922024

How they compare

Chile currently reports 49,370 t against 22,778 t in Southern Africa, a difference of 26,592 t.

That makes Chile's figure about 2.2 times Southern Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Southern Africa ahead.

Chile ranks 27th and Southern Africa ranks 25th of 225 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Southern Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Southern Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 2,749 t 4,326 t 1,577 t Southern Africa
1970s 3,374 t 5,811 t 2,437 t Southern Africa
1980s 6,113 t 7,048 t 934.99 t Southern Africa
1990s 14,693 t 7,796 t 6,897 t Chile
2000s 34,298 t 9,744 t 24,555 t Chile
2010s 44,460 t 14,647 t 29,814 t Chile
2020s 49,054 t 21,137 t 27,917 t Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Chile or Southern Africa?
Chile, at 49,370 t against 22,778 t in Southern Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Chile and Southern Africa?
26,592 t, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Southern Africa?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Chile and Southern Africa rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Chile ranks 27th and Southern Africa ranks 25th of 225 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Southern Africa: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/chile/southern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/chile/southern-africa/">Chile vs Southern Africa: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
255 places, 14,368 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.