Uruguay vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Uruguay
104,465 t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
107,887 t
in 2024
Uruguay rank
23rd
Zimbabwe rank
22nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Uruguay
  • Zimbabwe
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196119922024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 107,887 t against 104,465 t in Uruguay, a difference of 3,422 t.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Uruguay ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 250 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Uruguay averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Uruguay Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 46,098 t 8,078 t 38,020 t Uruguay
1970s 50,078 t 13,967 t 36,112 t Uruguay
1980s 53,553 t 11,144 t 42,409 t Uruguay
1990s 67,091 t 69,278 t 2,188 t Zimbabwe
2000s 87,379 t 80,574 t 6,805 t Uruguay
2010s 97,525 t 91,276 t 6,249 t Uruguay
2020s 103,981 t 101,426 t 2,555 t Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Uruguay or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 107,887 t against 104,465 t in Uruguay as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Uruguay and Zimbabwe?
3,422 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uruguay and Zimbabwe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Uruguay and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Uruguay ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Uruguay vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/uruguay/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/uruguay/zimbabwe/">Uruguay vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.