Samoa vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Samoa
219.28 t
in 2024
Suriname
217.55 t
in 2024
Samoa rank
204th
Suriname rank
205th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Samoa
  • Suriname
100200300400196119922024

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 219.28 t against 217.55 t in Suriname, a difference of 1.73 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.

Samoa ranks 204th and Suriname ranks 205th of 250 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 89.32 t 139.3 t 49.98 t Suriname
1970s 84.75 t 152.69 t 67.94 t Suriname
1980s 114.15 t 204.63 t 90.48 t Suriname
1990s 160.77 t 317.62 t 156.86 t Suriname
2000s 190.49 t 244.03 t 53.55 t Suriname
2010s 242.26 t 257.07 t 14.81 t Suriname
2020s 220.39 t 248.23 t 27.84 t Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Samoa or Suriname?
Samoa, at 219.28 t against 217.55 t in Suriname as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Samoa and Suriname?
1.73 t, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Suriname?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Samoa and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Samoa ranks 204th and Suriname ranks 205th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Samoa vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/samoa/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/samoa/suriname/">Samoa vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.