New Caledonia vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

New Caledonia
399.81 t
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
381.22 t
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
190th
Papua New Guinea rank
192nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Papua New Guinea
0200400600196119922024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 399.81 t against 381.22 t in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 18.59 t.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 190th and Papua New Guinea ranks 192nd of 250 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 4 and Papua New Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 427.64 t 153.55 t 274.09 t New Caledonia
1970s 389.67 t 350.28 t 39.39 t New Caledonia
1980s 347.44 t 354.82 t 7.39 t Papua New Guinea
1990s 502.21 t 391.68 t 110.53 t New Caledonia
2000s 484.14 t 511.45 t 27.3 t Papua New Guinea
2010s 438.73 t 498.79 t 60.06 t Papua New Guinea
2020s 411.4 t 394.13 t 17.27 t New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, New Caledonia or Papua New Guinea?
New Caledonia, at 399.81 t against 381.22 t in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between New Caledonia and Papua New Guinea?
18.59 t, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Papua New Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
New Caledonia ranks 190th and Papua New Guinea ranks 192nd of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/new-caledonia/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/new-caledonia/papua-new-guinea/">New Caledonia vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.