Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Colombia
125,421 t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
107,887 t
in 2024
Colombia rank
21st
Zimbabwe rank
22nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Colombia
  • Zimbabwe
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922024

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 125,421 t against 107,887 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 17,534 t.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Colombia has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 21st and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 250 countries.

Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 63,522 t 8,078 t 55,444 t Colombia
1970s 83,284 t 13,967 t 69,318 t Colombia
1980s 102,777 t 11,144 t 91,633 t Colombia
1990s 119,449 t 69,278 t 50,171 t Colombia
2000s 131,702 t 80,574 t 51,128 t Colombia
2010s 138,668 t 91,276 t 47,392 t Colombia
2020s 125,173 t 101,426 t 23,747 t Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Colombia or Zimbabwe?
Colombia, at 125,421 t against 107,887 t in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Colombia and Zimbabwe?
17,534 t, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Zimbabwe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Colombia and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Colombia ranks 21st and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/colombia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/colombia/zimbabwe/">Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.