China, Macao SAR vs Malta: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

China, Macao SAR
119.85 t
in 2024
Malta
111.7 t
in 2017
China, Macao SAR rank
217th
Malta rank
218th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Malta
0100200300196119922024

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 119.85 t against 111.7 t in Malta, a difference of 8.15 t.

That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 217th and Malta ranks 218th of 250 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 3 and Malta in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 104.3 t 256.54 t 152.25 t Malta
1970s 202.55 t 205.96 t 3.41 t Malta
1980s 111.61 t 171.44 t 59.83 t Malta
1990s 205.56 t 166.21 t 39.35 t China, Macao SAR
2000s 168.19 t 146.74 t 21.45 t China, Macao SAR
2010s 132.57 t 115.3 t 17.27 t China, Macao SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, China, Macao SAR or Malta?
China, Macao SAR, at 119.85 t against 111.7 t in Malta as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between China, Macao SAR and Malta?
8.15 t, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Malta?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do China, Macao SAR and Malta rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
China, Macao SAR ranks 217th and Malta ranks 218th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Malta: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/china-macao-sar/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/china-macao-sar/malta/">China, Macao SAR vs Malta: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.