Chile vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Chile
24,644 t
in 2024
Romania
29,447 t
in 2017
Chile rank
72nd
Romania rank
69th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Chile
  • Romania
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922024

How they compare

Romania currently reports 29,447 t against 24,644 t in Chile, a difference of 4,803 t.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Chile ranks 72nd and Romania ranks 69th of 250 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 19,126 t 48,884 t 29,758 t Romania
1970s 20,287 t 67,502 t 47,215 t Romania
1980s 23,543 t 60,811 t 37,268 t Romania
1990s 29,853 t 59,974 t 30,121 t Romania
2000s 27,250 t 43,210 t 15,960 t Romania
2010s 26,032 t 31,870 t 5,838 t Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Chile or Romania?
Romania, at 29,447 t against 24,644 t in Chile as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Chile and Romania?
4,803 t, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Romania?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Chile and Romania rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Chile ranks 72nd and Romania ranks 69th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/chile/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/chile/romania/">Chile vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.