Caribbean vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Caribbean
33,114 t
in 2024
Romania
29,447 t
in 2017
Caribbean rank
66th
Romania rank
69th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Caribbean
  • Romania
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922024

How they compare

Caribbean currently reports 33,114 t against 29,447 t in Romania, a difference of 3,667 t.

That makes Caribbean's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Caribbean ranks 66th and Romania ranks 69th of 250 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Caribbean averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Caribbean Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 47,047 t 48,884 t 1,837 t Romania
1970s 48,071 t 67,502 t 19,430 t Romania
1980s 49,576 t 60,811 t 11,235 t Romania
1990s 36,923 t 59,974 t 23,051 t Romania
2000s 36,126 t 43,210 t 7,084 t Romania
2010s 38,430 t 31,870 t 6,559 t Caribbean

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Caribbean or Romania?
Caribbean, at 33,114 t against 29,447 t in Romania as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Caribbean and Romania?
3,667 t, with Caribbean ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Romania?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Caribbean and Romania rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Caribbean ranks 66th and Romania ranks 69th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Caribbean vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/caribbean/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/caribbean/romania/">Caribbean vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.