Barbados vs Equatorial Guinea: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Barbados
17.57 t
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
8.8 t
in 2024
Barbados rank
237th
Equatorial Guinea rank
239th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Barbados
  • Equatorial Guinea
0255075100125196119922024

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 17.57 t against 8.8 t in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 8.77 t.

That makes Barbados's figure about 2.0 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 237th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 239th of 250 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 46.81 t 4.44 t 42.37 t Barbados
1970s 43.42 t 5.79 t 37.63 t Barbados
1980s 48.19 t 7.04 t 41.15 t Barbados
1990s 98.38 t 7.94 t 90.44 t Barbados
2000s 36.98 t 8.41 t 28.57 t Barbados
2010s 19.49 t 8.75 t 10.74 t Barbados
2020s 20.62 t 8.76 t 11.86 t Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Barbados or Equatorial Guinea?
Barbados, at 17.57 t against 8.8 t in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Barbados and Equatorial Guinea?
8.77 t, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Equatorial Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Barbados and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Barbados ranks 237th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 239th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Equatorial Guinea: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/barbados/equatorial-guinea-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/barbados/equatorial-guinea-2/">Barbados vs Equatorial Guinea: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.