Antigua and Barbuda vs Equatorial Guinea: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Antigua and Barbuda
8.68 t
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
8.8 t
in 2024
Antigua and Barbuda rank
241st
Equatorial Guinea rank
239th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Equatorial Guinea
020406080196119922024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 8.8 t against 8.68 t in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.12 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 241st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 239th of 250 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 6 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 23.63 t 4.44 t 19.19 t Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 32.24 t 5.79 t 26.45 t Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 60.59 t 7.04 t 53.55 t Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 24.97 t 7.94 t 17.03 t Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 18.96 t 8.41 t 10.55 t Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 14.49 t 8.75 t 5.74 t Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 7.08 t 8.76 t 1.68 t Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Antigua and Barbuda or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 8.8 t against 8.68 t in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Antigua and Barbuda and Equatorial Guinea?
0.12 t, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Equatorial Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 241st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 239th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Equatorial Guinea: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/antigua-and-barbuda/equatorial-guinea-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/antigua-and-barbuda/equatorial-guinea-2/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Equatorial Guinea: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.