Australia vs Uruguay: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Australia
0.0133 t per person
in 2024
Uruguay
0.0308 t per person
in 2024
Australia rank
4th
Uruguay rank
2nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Australia
  • Uruguay
0.010.0150.020.0250.030.035196119922024

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.0308 t per person against 0.0133 t per person in Australia, a difference of 0.0175 t per person.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 2.3 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Australia ranks 4th and Uruguay ranks 2nd of 167 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.011 t per person 0.0172 t per person 0.0062 t per person Uruguay
1970s 0.0158 t per person 0.0175 t per person 0.0017 t per person Uruguay
1980s 0.0132 t per person 0.0178 t per person 0.0046 t per person Uruguay
1990s 0.0142 t per person 0.021 t per person 0.0068 t per person Uruguay
2000s 0.0146 t per person 0.0266 t per person 0.012 t per person Uruguay
2010s 0.0137 t per person 0.029 t per person 0.0153 t per person Uruguay
2020s 0.0114 t per person 0.0307 t per person 0.0192 t per person Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Australia or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.0308 t per person against 0.0133 t per person in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Australia and Uruguay?
0.0175 t per person, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Uruguay?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Australia and Uruguay rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Australia ranks 4th and Uruguay ranks 2nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Uruguay: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/australia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/australia/uruguay/">Australia vs Uruguay: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.