Argentina vs Australia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Argentina
0.0118 t per person
in 2024
Australia
0.0133 t per person
in 2024
Argentina rank
5th
Australia rank
4th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Argentina
  • Australia
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922024

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0133 t per person against 0.0118 t per person in Argentina, a difference of 0.0015 t per person.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 5th and Australia ranks 4th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 4 and Australia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Australia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0183 t per person 0.011 t per person 0.0073 t per person Argentina
1970s 0.0168 t per person 0.0158 t per person 0.0011 t per person Argentina
1980s 0.0152 t per person 0.0132 t per person 0.002 t per person Argentina
1990s 0.0135 t per person 0.0142 t per person 0.0007 t per person Australia
2000s 0.0127 t per person 0.0146 t per person 0.0018 t per person Australia
2010s 0.0109 t per person 0.0137 t per person 0.0028 t per person Australia
2020s 0.0118 t per person 0.0114 t per person 0.0004 t per person Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Argentina or Australia?
Australia, at 0.0133 t per person against 0.0118 t per person in Argentina as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Argentina and Australia?
0.0015 t per person, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Australia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Argentina and Australia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Argentina ranks 5th and Australia ranks 4th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Australia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/argentina/australia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/argentina/australia/">Argentina vs Australia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,536 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.