Land locked developing countries vs Zimbabwe: Edible Fat Total — Food aid received
Land locked developing countries
21 t
in 2010
Zimbabwe
30 t
in 2007
Land locked developing countries rank
4th
Zimbabwe rank
10th
Edible Fat Total — Food aid received over time
- Land locked developing countries
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 30 t against 21 t in Land locked developing countries, a difference of 9 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times Land locked developing countries's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Land locked developing countries has been ahead every year.
Land locked developing countries ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 10th of 4 regions.
Land locked developing countries has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Land locked developing countries | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16,251 t | 72 t | 16,179 t | Land locked developing countries |
| 2000s | 1,937 t | 67.5 t | 1,869 t | Land locked developing countries |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible fat total — food aid received, Land locked developing countries or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 30 t against 21 t in Land locked developing countries as of 2007.
- What is the difference in edible fat total — food aid received between Land locked developing countries and Zimbabwe?
- 9 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Land locked developing countries and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2007.
- How do Land locked developing countries and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible fat total — food aid received?
- Land locked developing countries ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 10th of 4 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible Fat Total — Food aid received. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.