Kenya vs Southern Asia: Edible Fat Total — Food aid received
Kenya
5 t
in 2002
Southern Asia
109 t
in 2009
Kenya rank
11th
Southern Asia rank
9th
Edible Fat Total — Food aid received over time
- Kenya
- Southern Asia
How they compare
Southern Asia currently reports 109 t against 5 t in Kenya, a difference of 104 t.
That makes Southern Asia's figure about 21.8 times Kenya's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Southern Asia has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 11th and Southern Asia ranks 9th of 13 countries.
Southern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Southern Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 749.67 t | 2,958 t | 2,208 t | Southern Asia |
| 2000s | 218.33 t | 5,124 t | 4,906 t | Southern Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible fat total — food aid received, Kenya or Southern Asia?
- Southern Asia, at 109 t against 5 t in Kenya as of 2009.
- What is the difference in edible fat total — food aid received between Kenya and Southern Asia?
- 104 t, with Southern Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Southern Asia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2002.
- How do Kenya and Southern Asia rank globally for edible fat total — food aid received?
- Kenya ranks 11th and Southern Asia ranks 9th of 13 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible Fat Total — Food aid received. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.