Australia and New Zealand vs China: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of

Australia and New Zealand
3,482 kcal/cap/d
in 2024
China
3,483 kcal/cap/d
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
23rd
China rank
22nd

Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • China
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k200020122024

How they compare

China currently reports 3,483 kcal/cap/d against 3,482 kcal/cap/d in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1 kcal/cap/d.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 23rd and China ranks 22nd of 148 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand China Difference Ahead
2000s 3,263 kcal/cap/d 2,877 kcal/cap/d 386.22 kcal/cap/d Australia and New Zealand
2010s 3,452 kcal/cap/d 3,180 kcal/cap/d 271.5 kcal/cap/d Australia and New Zealand
2020s 3,456 kcal/cap/d 3,438 kcal/cap/d 18.4 kcal/cap/d Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of, Australia and New Zealand or China?
China, at 3,483 kcal/cap/d against 3,482 kcal/cap/d in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of between Australia and New Zealand and China?
1 kcal/cap/d, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and China?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and China rank globally for dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 23rd and China ranks 22nd of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of undernourishment (kcal/cap/day) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs China: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/dietary-energy-supply-used-in-the-estimation-of-the-prevalence-of-undernourishment-kcal/australia-and-new-zealand/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/dietary-energy-supply-used-in-the-estimation-of-the-prevalence-of-undernourishment-kcal/australia-and-new-zealand/china/">Australia and New Zealand vs China: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of undernourishment (kcal/cap/day) — Value
Unit
kcal/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
202 places, 4,760 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.