Jamaica vs Nepal: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of
Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of over time
- Jamaica
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 2,935 kcal/cap/d against 2,919 kcal/cap/d in Jamaica, a difference of 16 kcal/cap/d.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 86th and Nepal ranks 84th of 148 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,730 kcal/cap/d | 2,361 kcal/cap/d | 368.9 kcal/cap/d | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 2,819 kcal/cap/d | 2,748 kcal/cap/d | 71 kcal/cap/d | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 2,897 kcal/cap/d | 2,952 kcal/cap/d | 55.25 kcal/cap/d | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of, Jamaica or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 2,935 kcal/cap/d against 2,919 kcal/cap/d in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of between Jamaica and Nepal?
- 16 kcal/cap/d, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Nepal?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Nepal rank globally for dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of?
- Jamaica ranks 86th and Nepal ranks 84th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of undernourishment (kcal/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.