Australia and New Zealand vs Central Asia and Southern Asia: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of

Australia and New Zealand
3,494 kcal/cap/d
in 2023
Central Asia and Southern Asia
2,698 kcal/cap/d
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
25th
Central Asia and Southern Asia rank
27th

Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Central Asia and Southern Asia
01.0k2.0k3.0k200020112023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 3,494 kcal/cap/d against 2,698 kcal/cap/d in Central Asia and Southern Asia, a difference of 796 kcal/cap/d.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Central Asia and Southern Asia's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 25th and Central Asia and Southern Asia ranks 27th of 148 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Central Asia and Southern Asia Difference Ahead
2000s 3,281 kcal/cap/d 2,348 kcal/cap/d 933.1 kcal/cap/d Australia and New Zealand
2010s 3,447 kcal/cap/d 2,493 kcal/cap/d 954.1 kcal/cap/d Australia and New Zealand
2020s 3,468 kcal/cap/d 2,648 kcal/cap/d 820 kcal/cap/d Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of, Australia and New Zealand or Central Asia and Southern Asia?
Australia and New Zealand, at 3,494 kcal/cap/d against 2,698 kcal/cap/d in Central Asia and Southern Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of between Australia and New Zealand and Central Asia and Southern Asia?
796 kcal/cap/d, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Central Asia and Southern Asia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Central Asia and Southern Asia rank globally for dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 25th and Central Asia and Southern Asia ranks 27th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of undernourishment (kcal/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Central Asia and Southern Asia: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/dietary-energy-supply-used-in-the-estimation-of-the-prevalence-of-undernourishment-kcal-2/australia-and-new-zealand/central-asia-and-southern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/dietary-energy-supply-used-in-the-estimation-of-the-prevalence-of-undernourishment-kcal-2/australia-and-new-zealand/central-asia-and-southern-asia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Central Asia and Southern Asia: Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dietary energy supply used in the estimation of the prevalence of undernourishment (kcal/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
kcal/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
202 places, 4,806 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.