Greece vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cottonseed — Processing

Greece
151,900 t
in 2013
United Republic of Tanzania
212,876 t
in 2013
Greece rank
16th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
3rd

Cottonseed — Processing over time

  • Greece
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119872013

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 212,876 t against 151,900 t in Greece, a difference of 60,976 t.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.4 times Greece's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Greece ahead.

Greece ranks 16th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 93 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 5 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greece United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 138,111 t 94,664 t 43,448 t Greece
1970s 245,900 t 113,942 t 131,958 t Greece
1980s 246,850 t 89,272 t 157,578 t Greece
1990s 425,670 t 108,982 t 316,688 t Greece
2000s 301,980 t 127,889 t 174,091 t Greece
2010s 136,650 t 173,264 t 36,614 t United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cottonseed — processing, Greece or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 212,876 t against 151,900 t in Greece as of 2013.
What is the difference in cottonseed — processing between Greece and United Republic of Tanzania?
60,976 t, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and United Republic of Tanzania?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Greece and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for cottonseed — processing?
Greece ranks 16th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cottonseed — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greece vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cottonseed — Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cottonseed-processing/greece/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cottonseed-processing/greece/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Greece vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cottonseed — Processing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cottonseed — Processing
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
131 places, 6,606 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.