Eswatini vs Zambia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Eswatini
1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
103rd
Zambia rank
104th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Zambia
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 103rd and Zambia ranks 104th of 159 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6815 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4543 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 1.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3606 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8674 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3418 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9523 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 1.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3362 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9878 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.7305 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4385 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.292 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8608 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2099 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Eswatini or Zambia?
Eswatini, at 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Eswatini and Zambia?
0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Zambia rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Eswatini ranks 103rd and Zambia ranks 104th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Zambia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/zambia/">Eswatini vs Zambia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.