Eswatini vs Niger: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Eswatini
1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Niger
1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
103rd
Niger rank
102nd

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Niger
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Niger currently reports 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Niger's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 103rd and Niger ranks 102nd of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Niger in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Niger Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6815 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2722 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4093 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 1.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2787 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9493 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3899 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5208 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7734 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.8416 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7728 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0688 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0635 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger
2020s 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.115 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Eswatini or Niger?
Niger, at 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Eswatini and Niger?
0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Niger?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Niger rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Eswatini ranks 103rd and Niger ranks 102nd of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Niger: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/niger/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/niger/">Eswatini vs Niger: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.