Poland vs Upper middle income: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Poland
114.88 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Upper middle income
29.64 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland rank
9th
Upper middle income rank
11th

Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Poland
  • Upper middle income
0255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 114.88 metric tons per square kilometre against 29.64 metric tons per square kilometre in Upper middle income, a difference of 85.24 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Poland's figure about 3.9 times Upper middle income's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 9th and Upper middle income ranks 11th of 181 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Upper middle income Difference Ahead
1960s 52.3 metric tons per square kilometre 7.1 metric tons per square kilometre 45.21 metric tons per square kilometre Poland
1970s 65.32 metric tons per square kilometre 10.44 metric tons per square kilometre 54.88 metric tons per square kilometre Poland
1980s 75.75 metric tons per square kilometre 14.55 metric tons per square kilometre 61.2 metric tons per square kilometre Poland
1990s 81.78 metric tons per square kilometre 17.7 metric tons per square kilometre 64.08 metric tons per square kilometre Poland
2000s 85.71 metric tons per square kilometre 19.86 metric tons per square kilometre 65.85 metric tons per square kilometre Poland
2010s 93.88 metric tons per square kilometre 26.37 metric tons per square kilometre 67.51 metric tons per square kilometre Poland
2020s 113.67 metric tons per square kilometre 29.28 metric tons per square kilometre 84.39 metric tons per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Poland or Upper middle income?
Poland, at 114.88 metric tons per square kilometre against 29.64 metric tons per square kilometre in Upper middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Poland and Upper middle income?
85.24 metric tons per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Upper middle income?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Poland and Upper middle income rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Poland ranks 9th and Upper middle income ranks 11th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Upper middle income: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/poland/upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/poland/upper-middle-income/">Poland vs Upper middle income: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.