Small island developing States (SIDS) vs Solomon Islands: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value

Small island developing States (SIDS)
67.1 %
in 2021
Solomon Islands
100 %
in 2021
Small island developing States (SIDS) rank
3rd
Solomon Islands rank
1st

Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value over time

  • Small island developing States (SIDS)
  • Solomon Islands
020406080100200020102021

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 100 % against 67.1 % in Small island developing States (SIDS), a difference of 32.9 %.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.5 times Small island developing States (SIDS)'s.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.

Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 3rd and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 17 regions.

Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Small island developing States (SIDS) Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 70.23 % 92.14 % 21.91 % Solomon Islands
2010s 68.55 % 94.95 % 26.4 % Solomon Islands
2020s 71.6 % 100 % 28.4 % Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value, Small island developing States (SIDS) or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 100 % against 67.1 % in Small island developing States (SIDS) as of 2021.
What is the difference in cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value between Small island developing States (SIDS) and Solomon Islands?
32.9 %, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Small island developing States (SIDS) and Solomon Islands?
14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Small island developing States (SIDS) and Solomon Islands rank globally for cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value?
Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 3rd and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 17 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Small island developing States (SIDS) vs Solomon Islands: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-import-dependency-ratio-percent-3-year-average-value/small-island-developing-states-sids/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-import-dependency-ratio-percent-3-year-average-value/small-island-developing-states-sids/solomon-islands/">Small island developing States (SIDS) vs Solomon Islands: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
212 places, 4,414 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.