Eastern Asia vs Viet Nam: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Eastern Asia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 15.4 % against 12.2 % in Eastern Asia, a difference of 3.2 %.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.3 times Eastern Asia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eastern Asia ahead.
Eastern Asia ranks 16th and Viet Nam ranks 13th of 37 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eastern Asia averaged higher in 2 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.49 % | -12.32 % | 20.81 % | Eastern Asia |
| 2010s | 6.77 % | 1.28 % | 5.49 % | Eastern Asia |
| 2020s | 11.7 % | 15.4 % | 3.7 % | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value, Eastern Asia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 15.4 % against 12.2 % in Eastern Asia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value between Eastern Asia and Viet Nam?
- 3.2 %, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Viet Nam?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Eastern Asia and Viet Nam rank globally for cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value?
- Eastern Asia ranks 16th and Viet Nam ranks 13th of 37 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.