Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value

Australia
-241.6 %
in 2021
Australia and New Zealand
-212.6 %
in 2021
Australia rank
155th
Australia and New Zealand rank
154th

Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value over time

  • Australia
  • Australia and New Zealand
-250-200-150-100200020102021

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports -212.6 % against -241.6 % in Australia, a difference of 29 %.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 155th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 154th of 158 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s -146.69 % -129.63 % 17.06 % Australia and New Zealand
2010s -190.41 % -161.6 % 28.81 % Australia and New Zealand
2020s -227.7 % -198.1 % 29.6 % Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value, Australia or Australia and New Zealand?
Australia and New Zealand, at -212.6 % against -241.6 % in Australia as of 2021.
What is the difference in cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value between Australia and Australia and New Zealand?
29 %, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Australia and New Zealand?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Australia and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value?
Australia ranks 155th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 154th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-import-dependency-ratio-percent-3-year-average-value/australia/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-import-dependency-ratio-percent-3-year-average-value/australia/australia-and-new-zealand/">Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
212 places, 4,414 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.