Armenia vs Japan: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Armenia
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 76.8 % against 75 % in Armenia, a difference of 1.8 %.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 51st and Japan ranks 49th of 158 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value, Armenia or Japan?
- Japan, at 76.8 % against 75 % in Armenia as of 2007.
- What is the difference in cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value between Armenia and Japan?
- 1.8 %, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Japan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2007.
- How do Armenia and Japan rank globally for cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value?
- Armenia ranks 51st and Japan ranks 49th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.