Eastern Africa vs Mexico: Bananas — Losses
Bananas — Losses over time
- Eastern Africa
- Mexico
How they compare
Eastern Africa currently reports 1,446 1000 t against 221 1000 t in Mexico, a difference of 1,225 1000 t.
That makes Eastern Africa's figure about 6.5 times Mexico's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Eastern Africa has been ahead every year.
Eastern Africa ranks 9th and Mexico ranks 9th of 28 groups.
Eastern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Africa | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,310 1000 t | 190.9 1000 t | 1,119 1000 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2020s | 1,332 1000 t | 211.5 1000 t | 1,121 1000 t | Eastern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bananas — losses, Eastern Africa or Mexico?
- Eastern Africa, at 1,446 1000 t against 221 1000 t in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in bananas — losses between Eastern Africa and Mexico?
- 1,225 1000 t, with Eastern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Africa and Mexico?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Africa and Mexico rank globally for bananas — losses?
- Eastern Africa ranks 9th and Mexico ranks 9th of 28 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Bananas — Losses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.