Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 131.2 g/cap/d against 99.1 g/cap/d in Viet Nam, a difference of 32.1 g/cap/d.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.3 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 6th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 166 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.91 g/cap/d | 66.3 g/cap/d | 10.61 g/cap/d | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 105.09 g/cap/d | 87.86 g/cap/d | 17.23 g/cap/d | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 130.55 g/cap/d | 97.6 g/cap/d | 32.95 g/cap/d | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Mongolia, at 131.2 g/cap/d against 99.1 g/cap/d in Viet Nam as of 2021.
- What is the difference in average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 32.1 g/cap/d, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value?
- Mongolia ranks 6th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.