China, Macao SAR vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value

China, Macao SAR
114.7 g/cap/d
in 2021
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
78.7 g/cap/d
in 2021
China, Macao SAR rank
27th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
11th

Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0255075100125200020102021

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 114.7 g/cap/d against 78.7 g/cap/d in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 36 g/cap/d.

That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 1.5 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 22 years both countries report, China, Macao SAR has been ahead every year.

China, Macao SAR ranks 27th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 11th of 166 countries.

China, Macao SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 87.47 g/cap/d 63.69 g/cap/d 23.78 g/cap/d China, Macao SAR
2010s 115.33 g/cap/d 75.06 g/cap/d 40.27 g/cap/d China, Macao SAR
2020s 113.2 g/cap/d 78.55 g/cap/d 34.65 g/cap/d China, Macao SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value, China, Macao SAR or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
China, Macao SAR, at 114.7 g/cap/d against 78.7 g/cap/d in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2021.
What is the difference in average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value between China, Macao SAR and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
36 g/cap/d, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do China, Macao SAR and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value?
China, Macao SAR ranks 27th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 11th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/average-protein-supply-g-cap-day-3-year-average-value/china-macao-sar/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/average-protein-supply-g-cap-day-3-year-average-value/china-macao-sar/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">China, Macao SAR vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average protein supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
g/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
222 places, 4,679 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.