Armenia vs Grenada: Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value
Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Armenia
- Grenada
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 111 g/cap/d against 110.6 g/cap/d in Armenia, a difference of 0.4 g/cap/d.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Grenada ahead.
Armenia ranks 66th and Grenada ranks 64th of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Grenada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.45 g/cap/d | 85.31 g/cap/d | 18.86 g/cap/d | Grenada |
| 2010s | 103.83 g/cap/d | 87.94 g/cap/d | 15.89 g/cap/d | Armenia |
| 2020s | 110.25 g/cap/d | 109.45 g/cap/d | 0.8 g/cap/d | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value, Armenia or Grenada?
- Grenada, at 111 g/cap/d against 110.6 g/cap/d in Armenia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value between Armenia and Grenada?
- 0.4 g/cap/d, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Grenada?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and Grenada rank globally for average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — value?
- Armenia ranks 66th and Grenada ranks 64th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average fat supply (g/cap/day) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.