Polynesia vs Russian Federation: Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)
Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) over time
- Polynesia
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 145 % against 94 % in Polynesia, a difference of 51 %.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.5 times Polynesia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Polynesia ranks 15th and Russian Federation ranks 13th of 17 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Polynesia | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.9 % | 127.3 % | 44.4 % | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 88.2 % | 137.7 % | 49.5 % | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 93.25 % | 142.25 % | 49 % | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average), Polynesia or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 145 % against 94 % in Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) between Polynesia and Russian Federation?
- 51 %, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Russian Federation?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Polynesia and Russian Federation rank globally for average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)?
- Polynesia ranks 15th and Russian Federation ranks 13th of 17 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.