New Zealand vs Slovenia: Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)
Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) over time
- New Zealand
- Slovenia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 130 % against 130 % in Slovenia, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 67th and Slovenia ranks 67th of 148 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 127.4 % | 124.2 % | 3.2 % | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 128.5 % | 129.2 % | 0.7 % | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 127.25 % | 127.25 % | 0 % | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average), New Zealand or Slovenia?
- New Zealand, at 130 % against 130 % in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) between New Zealand and Slovenia?
- 0 %, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Slovenia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Slovenia rank globally for average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)?
- New Zealand ranks 67th and Slovenia ranks 67th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.