Namibia vs Rwanda: Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)
Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) over time
- Namibia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 109 % against 109 % in Rwanda, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 125th and Rwanda ranks 125th of 148 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 101.8 % | 102.5 % | 0.7 % | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 105.5 % | 101.2 % | 4.3 % | Namibia |
| 2020s | 109 % | 107 % | 2 % | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average), Namibia or Rwanda?
- Namibia, at 109 % against 109 % in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) between Namibia and Rwanda?
- 0 %, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Rwanda?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Namibia and Rwanda rank globally for average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)?
- Namibia ranks 125th and Rwanda ranks 125th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.